Understanding Religious Violence: Thinking Outside the Box on TerrorismThere is a long-standing fear of that which is not understood. Since September 11, 2001 the fear surrounding the violent elements of religion has led to heightened tensions. Research is thus essential to counteract the effects of 'religious xenophobia'. In this compelling book J.P. Larsson investigates religious violence, terrorism and armed conflict in order to deliver the understanding required for a more peaceful world and to allow for a framework of conflict transformation. This multi-disciplinary text will greatly interest those in the fields of international relations, theology and sociology. |
Từ bên trong sách
Kết quả 1-3 trong 12
Trang 86
Rationality : Rational Actor Model vs. Religious Rationality First , I will highlight why religion does not fit the Rational Actor Model ( also known as Rational Choice Theory ) and what this means for the arguments presented above .
Rationality : Rational Actor Model vs. Religious Rationality First , I will highlight why religion does not fit the Rational Actor Model ( also known as Rational Choice Theory ) and what this means for the arguments presented above .
Trang 87
Even gender - related research , which is usually renowned for unconventional approaches to conventional scholarship , bases its research into religion and rationality on economics . Although rational choice research has influenced ...
Even gender - related research , which is usually renowned for unconventional approaches to conventional scholarship , bases its research into religion and rationality on economics . Although rational choice research has influenced ...
Trang 88
powers were bitter enemies , but they both none the less complied with the RAM , and although escalation led to the concept of MAD ( Mutually Assured Destruction ) , the ' rationality ' of both actors prevented a direct war from ...
powers were bitter enemies , but they both none the less complied with the RAM , and although escalation led to the concept of MAD ( Mutually Assured Destruction ) , the ' rationality ' of both actors prevented a direct war from ...
Nội dung mọi người đang nói đến - Viết bài đánh giá
Chúng tôi không t́m thấy bài đánh giá nào ở các vị trí thông thường.
Nội dung
Illustrative of Contemporary Perspectives | 29 |
Philosophical Prerequisites for Contemporary Perspectives | 61 |
Religious Origins of Contemporary Perspectives | 105 |
Bản quyền | |
6 phần khác không được hiển thị
Ấn bản in khác - Xem tất cả
Understanding Religious Violence: Thinking Outside the Box on Terrorism J.P. Larsson Xem trước bị giới hạn - 2017 |
Understanding Religious Violence: Thinking Outside the Box on Terrorism J.P. Larsson Xem trước bị giới hạn - 2017 |
Thuật ngữ và cụm từ thông dụng
academic accept according acknowledged actors applicable approach argued argument armed conflict become believers Buddhism cause chapter Christian claim common completely concept conflict resolution conflict transformation contemporary course created definition dialogue difficult disciplines earlier employed enemy evil example existence explain explored fact faith fear force framework fundamental further genuine groups highlighted human identity illustration important impossible individual influence international arena international relations invariably Islamic issues justified killing language laws logic means merely namely narratives nature necessarily necessary notion one's particular peace perceived perspectives pertains political possible practice present problem question Rational Choice Theory rationality reasons recognise referred religion religious conflict religious truth religious violence scholars secular seen similarly society struggle terrorism terrorist theory threat throughout tradition true truth types ultimately understanding University usually Western Whilst