Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: The Origins of the Annalistic TraditionUniversity of Michigan Press, 1999 - 345 trang Recent years have seen a welcome growth of interest in the history of early Rome. Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: the Origins of the Annalistic Tradition contributes important information on this period by focusing on the earliest stages of Roman historical writing. The book is once again available, with a new Introduction by the author that brings the work up to date and helps place it in its current context. This book remains the starting point for study of the pre-annalistic tradition of Roman history. When first published, the volume sparked a lively debate among classicists and historians of the ancient world. Previous scholarship had often assigned the pontifical chronicle a central role not only in preserving the history of the early Republic, but also in shaping the form of the annalistic tradition. But the author showed that these assumptions rested on insecure foundations; to a large extent, they misrepresented the historiographic development of the annalistic tradition as we know it from, above all, Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Perhaps the book's most controversial contention was that the final eighty-book edition of the chronicle, which previous scholars had dated to the later second century BCE, is more probably a massive reworking of materials in the Augustan period. This finding will likely require a considerable revision in our understanding of the development of the annalistic tradition. In the course of making these innovative arguments, the author offers extensive information about the origins of the annalistic tradition and about the early history and historiography of Rome. Bruce W. Frier is Professor of Classics and Roman Law, and Henry King Ransom Professor of Law, University of Michigan. He has published numerous books and articles on classical and legal topics, and has won the Charles J. Goodwin Award of Merit from the American Philological Association. |
Nội dung
Preface and Acknowledgements | 9 |
Verrius Flaccus and the 80book Anna | 27 |
Fragments Attributable to the Verrian | 39 |
The Substance of the Verrian Annales | 49 |
Cicero on the Pontifical Chronicle | 69 |
The Nature of the Tabula | 83 |
The Inception of the Chronicle | 107 |
The Fasti from 509390 and the Libr | 137 |
The Augustan Edition of the Annales | 179 |
The Annalistic Tradition | 201 |
Fabii Pictores | 227 |
The Origins of the Annalistic Tradition | 255 |
Bibliography on the Pontifical Chronicle | 285 |
Fragments and Testimonies Pertaining to the Pon | 297 |
Q Fabius Pictor Prospectus of the Fragments | 322 |
From the Tabula to the Annales Maximi | 161 |
Ấn bản in khác - Xem tất cả
Thuật ngữ và cụm từ thông dụng
80-book edition ancient Annales Maximi Annales Pontificum annalibus annalistic tradition annalium Antias antiquarian Application of passage Asellio Atthis Augustan authors bibliography Book Cato century B.C. chronicle's Cicero Cichorius citations cited Claudius Comitium Commentary consul Content of passage Dionysius discussion documents earlier early annalists early Republic early Rome Ennius eponymous F. W. Walbank Fabii Fabius Pictor Fasti fragments Gellius Gelzer Geschichte Greek haruspices Hemina historians historiography HRR vol Jacoby late Republican libri lintei libro literary Livy Livy's Macer Macrobius Main treatment Momigliano Mommsen narrative original Origo perhaps Peter Pictor frg Piso frg plebeian Plutarch Polyb Polybius pontifex maximus pontifical chronicle pontifices probably prodigy Punic Quadrigarius quae quod R. M. Ogilvie records reference regal period Relation of passage Roman history Rome Rome's Römischen Scaevola scholion Second Punic War Soltau sources style tabula tion Verrius Flaccus δὲ καὶ