...hiftory of mankind in thcif ftate ; that of the favage, who is not yet acquainted with 4 property ; property ; and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not afcertained by laws, a principal objeft of care and defire. Such readers as are defirous of forming fome general conception of our fpecies...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., 'that of the savage who is not yet acquainted with property ; and that of the barbarian, to whom it is — although not ascertained by laws— a principal object of care and desire.' The distinction Tiere made between the...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., that of the savage, who is not yet acquainted with property, and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire. The distinction here made between the savage...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., that of the savage, who is not yet acquainted with property, and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire. FLEMING. Can it be possible that man, a...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., that of the savage, who is not yet acquainted with property, and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire. The distinction here made between the savage...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., that of the savage, s very striking. As there were in Europe then, so there are in India now, several systems of la ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire. FLEMING. Can it be possible that man, a...

...history of mankind, in their rudest state, may be considered under two heads, viz., that of the savage, who is not yet acquainted with property, and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire. The distinction here made between the savage...

...separate heads under which to consider the history of mankind in their rudest state; that of the savage who is not yet acquainted with property; and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principal object of care and desire.' Adam Ferguson, Essay on the History of...

...and may furnifh two feparate heads, under which to confider the hiftory of mankind in their rudett ftate ; that of the favage, who is not yet acquainted...which are the effects of time, fome method of defining pofleffion. The very defire of it proceeds from experience; and the induftry by which it is gained,...

...economic formj must create a material difference of character.... There is the case of the savage, who is not yet acquainted with property; and that of the barbarian, to whom it is, although not ascertained by laws, a principle object of care and desire. ... It must appear very evident, that property...