Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959
"Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530.
Nội dung mọi người đang nói đến - Viết bài đánh giá
Chúng tôi không t́m thấy bài đánh giá nào ở các vị trí thông thường.
Ấn bản in khác - Xem tất cả
affirmed appeal appellant's appellee application argument Associate C. C. P. A. Patents CCPA cited claim clearly Commissioner of Patents compounds confusion considered consisting containing counsel count Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined DETERMINED device directed disclosed disclosure District Court effect equivalent establish evidence Examiner fact filed follows given granted ground held holding indicated instant interference invention inventor involved issue Judge limitation March mark material matter means merely motion necessary noted operation opinion opposition original party Patent Appeals Patent Office portion position practice present pressure printed prior prior art question reasons record reduction reference registration rejection relates relied respect result reversed Rule shown similar specification structure subject matter substantially sufficient suggested testimony tests tion trademark United USPQ valve
Trang 297 - An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
Trang 244 - Office an affidavit showing that said mark is still in use or showing that its nonuse is due to special circumstances which excuse such nonuse and is not due to any intention to abandon the mark.
Trang 281 - ... which concealment or addition shall fully appear to have been made for the purpose of deceiving the public, or that the thing thus secured by patent was not originally discovered by the patentee, but had been in use, or had been described in some public work anterior to the supposed discovery of the patentee...
Trang 27 - The Commissioner may issue several reissued patents for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented, upon demand of the applicant, and upon payment of the required fee for a reissue for each of such reissued patents.
Trang 97 - A person shall be entitled to a patent unless: a. the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or b.
Trang 356 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Trang 20 - Whenever any patent is, through error without any deceptive intention, deemed wholly or partly inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent...
Trang 152 - Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive...
Trang 120 - In the view we take of this case, it will not be necessary to consider appellant's argument to the effect that appellee's registration for "SLUMBER-KINS" was obtained on a false affidavit and therefore cannot be relied upon for any purpose in this opposition proceeding.