Between Athens and Jerusalem: Philosophy, Prophecy, and Politics in Leo Strauss's Early ThoughtState University of New York Press, 1 thg 1, 2009 - 272 trang Praised as a major political thinker of the twentieth century and vilified as the putative godfather of contemporary neoconservatism, Leo Strauss (1899–1973) has been the object of heated controversy both in the United States and abroad. This book offers a more balanced appraisal by focusing on Strauss's early writings. By means of a close and comprehensive study of these texts, David Janssens reconstructs the genesis of Strauss's thought from its earliest beginnings until his emigration to the United States in 1937. He discusses the first stages in Strauss's grappling with the "theological-political problem," from his doctoral dissertation on Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi to his contributions to Zionist periodicals, from his groundbreaking study of Spinoza's critique of religion to his research on Moses Mendelssohn, and from his rediscovery of medieval Jewish and Islamic philosophy to his research on Hobbes. Throughout, Janssens traces Strauss's rediscovery of the Socratic way of life as a viable alternative to both modern philosophy and revealed religion. |
Nội dung
| 1 | |
1 In the Grip of theTheologicalPolitical Predicament | 7 |
2 The Shadow of Spinoza | 31 |
3 The Second Cave | 77 |
4 The Order of Human Things | 109 |
5 Socrates and the Leviathan | 149 |
6 Epilogue | 173 |
Notes | 195 |
| 241 | |
| 251 | |
Ấn bản in khác - Xem tất cả
Between Athens and Jerusalem: Philosophy, Prophecy, and Politics in Leo ... David Janssens Xem trước bị giới hạn - 2009 |
Between Athens and Jerusalem: Philosophy, Prophecy, and Politics in Leo ... David Janssens Không có bản xem trước - 2008 |
Thuật ngữ và cụm từ thông dụng
able According aimed already answer appears approach argues argument asserts attempt authority basis becomes begin belief Bible biblical calls chapter character claim classical Cohen concept concern condition critical critique of religion culture developed dialogue difference distinction divine doctrine Enlightenment existence experience explains fact faith fear finds follows foundation fundamental guided Hence historical Hobbes Hobbes’s human important interest interpretation Jewish Judaism justice knowledge latter Leo Strauss less liberal Maimonides means miracles modern moral natural observes original orthodoxy Plato political philosophy political Zionism position possible prejudice present Press principle problem proves providence question radical rationalism reading reason refers regarding rejects religious remains requires result revealed Schmitt sense shows Socrates Spinoza Spinoza’s Critique Strauss argues takes Theological-Political theology things thought tion tradition Treatise true truth turn ultimate understanding University writings