T́m kiếm H́nh ảnh Maps Play YouTube Tin tức Gmail Drive Thêm »
Đăng nhập
Sách Sách
" A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... "
Committee Prints - Trang 16
bởi United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957
Xem Toàn bộ - Giới thiệu về cuốn sách này

Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in ...

United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 trang
...of claim 12 and the prior art. The law is that the claimed subject matter is not patentable if this difference "between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art" is "such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

United States Code, Tập 5

United States - 2000 - 1208 trang
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Patent Law Codification and Revision: Hearongs ... H.R. 3760 ... June 1951

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1951 - 246 trang
...103 is an attempt to state it in the statute. It refers to the difference between the subject matter to be patented and the prior art, meaning what was known before ; if this difference is such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time...

Rules of Practice of the United States Patent Office in Patent Cases

United States. Patent Office - 1952 - 170 trang
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 ~of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in ...

United States. Patent Office - 1954 - 480 trang
...the courts. An invention which has been made, and which Is new In the sense that the same thing baa not been made before, may still not be patentable...patented and the prior art, meaning what was known before UK described in section 102. If this difference is such that the subject matter as a whole would have...

American Patent System: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Patents ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 444 trang
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Proposals for Improving the Patent System: Committee Print...84-2

United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1956 - 536 trang
...disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title [the prior art], if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Government Assistance to Invention and Research: A Legislative History ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1960 - 1034 trang
...reason that, even though an invention is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Procurement Law Statutes

United States. Department of the Army - 1961 - 346 trang
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made...

Drug Industry Antitrust Act, 87-1&2

United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1961 - 1928 trang
...the present statute, 35 USC 103, for convincing J the Commissioner of Patents that the— differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art I are such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at tin time the invention...




  1. Thư viện của tôi
  2. Trợ giúp
  3. T́m kiếm Sách Nâng cao
  4. Tải bản ePub xuống
  5. Tải bản PDF xuống