Hình ảnh trang
PDF
ePub

the plough as deep as poffible. In order to do this effectually, it will fometimes be needful for a fecond plough to follow the firft in the fame furrow; which will throw the mould over, and bury the ftubble and weeds. In this cafe there will be a new foil uppermoft, which, being fresh to the air, will receive much greater and more lafting benefit from the fun, the rain, and the frofts, than it otherwife could do, as thereby it will attract a greater quantity of the nutrition which thefe afford. The ftubble and weeds, being by this method of ploughing buried deep, will much fooner rot than when juft covered. In this ftate the ridges will lie high, and, if the land be wet or of the brick-earth kind, will be full of clots or large lumps.

No time fhould now be loft by delaying to render this newly turned up foil as fine as harrowing can make it. I know in this particular my judgment will be called in queftion by numbers. Common farmers will fay, "To what purpofe is all this expence and labour, when, if the "land be fuffered to lie in its rough "ftate through the winter, the froft "and the rains will do the work for "you?" But this is the language of the fluggard and the inexperienced hufbandman only.

I am convinced, by repeated experiments, clofe obfervations, and plain reafoning on known facts, that lands which are made fine before the fharp froft and winter rains come on, will receive a much greater fhare of their influence than any other.

If the land be left in a rough ftate, there is feldom time for the rains and frost to affect more than the outfide of the large clods or lumps; the outfide will indeed be pulvezized, but the middle of the lumps,

wherever they are large, will be found nearly in the fame hard fliff ftate as when turned up by the plough. Hence it must appear to every one, that in this cafe the benefit of air, winter rains, and frofts, on lands thus left, is partial; and the confequence is, that harrowing it in the fpring, when these are over, is too late for its receiving the benefit which would have accrued from them; and the power of vege tation is not fo vigorous.

But to make winter fallows as fine as they can be in autumn, and then ridge them up in that pulverized ftate, is acting mot agreeable to nature. The greateft poffible quantity of furface is by this means expofed to the atmosphere; and the fand is left in a ftate wherein the rains and the froft are mott eafily admiffible. They will then penetrate and enrich the whole mafs to a greater depth.

If the froft penetrates a quantity of earth, formed into a large hard clod, partially, on account of its bulk and hardness (which is always found to be the cafe) it is evident that the fame clod, broken into four parts, would be thereby penetrated four times as much; or, in other words, four times the quantity of earth would be affected by it, and on a thaw be pulverized. For we find that, after the breaking up of a fevere froft, all the fmall clods crumble easily into powder; while the large ones are only made fmaller by the crumbling off of their furfaces to a certain depth.

By this deep ploughing which I have recommended, the worn.out foil being turned in, the fecond ftratum of fresh earth is now uppermoft; and having, by being made as fine as it can be in autumn, been expofed

expofed to the air, the rain, and the froft during winter, is thereby fweetened and cleanfed of its impurities; and thus become a new fresh fertilized earth, in the beft poffible state for vigorous vegetation.

Many farmers will probably object to this method, on account of its being attended with a little extra expence. But I wish them to confider, first, that this expence is more

am recommending, being heavier by near half a ton per acre.

The extra expence on this part was only about eight fhillings per acre; the extra produce yielded an extra profit of more than twenty fhillings per acre.

I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c.
A LANDHOLDER.

in appearance than reality, for lefs To preferve Turnips from Froft. From

labour is requifite in the fpring; and fecondly, that it will be amply repaid by the goodness of fucceeding crops.

About feven years fince, I made a comparative experiment of this kind. on a field of ten acres, the foil of which was equal as poffible in goodnefs. The one half of this field I left after ploughing in its rough ftate, the furface being covered with large hard clods. The other half I made as fine as poffible by harrowing with ox harrows, and beating in pieces the hardest and largest clods which the harrow would not break.

In the fpring, the part I had harrowed was much finer, without any additional labour, than I could render the other (which was left in its Tough ftate) by repeated harrowings; for the rain and the froft having not penetrated the middle of the large clods, they had received no benefit therefrom, and were as hard as bricks, being only leffened in

fize.

I fowed the whole field with barley the last week in April, and threw nine pounds of broad clover in with it. On harvesting it, I kept the crops feparate the parts lett rough produced twenty-four bufhels per acre; the other thirty one; the latter by much the fineft fample. The crop of clover next year was equally in favour of the method I

the fame.

[By a Gentleman Farmer.]

Mr. RACK,

Ν

IN anfwer to your enquiry, whe

ther we have adopted any method of preferving Turnips from the froft; or for feeding cattle late in the fpring; and, if fo, what thofe methods were? I beg leave to obferve, that nothing of this kind is yet come into general practice in this county. With refpect to preferving turnips from fuch fevere frofts as we had this laft winter, efpecially when there has not been fnow enough to cover them, I believe it would be utterly impracticable, unless the turnips were drawn previous to fuch frofts.

This would on the whole never anfwer the farmer's purpofe; as the certain trouble and expence of houfing or ftacking them would far exceed the advantage, even in a hard feafon; and, in mild winters, would be entirely loft.

To preferve them for late fpringfeed, is not fo difficult an undertak. ing. Divers methods have been tried, and among the reft that of drawing and burying them in fand; but this has not anfwered, for the following, among other, reafons:

Turnips are a very juicy root; and

although

although fand be perfectly dry when thrown among them, yet, when packed together in large heaps, they naturally fweat, and communicate a moisture, which, with the hot quality of the fand, raises a ftill greater heat; and as warmth and moisture are two qualities which greatly promote vegetation, the vegetation of thefe roots is the first thing that renders them ufelefs. They will grow till the growing quality is exhaufted; and then, by putrifying, become quite unfit for food.

The best method of preferving them that I have heard of, and which has been tried with fuccefs by fome of our best farmers, is, to ftack them up in dry ftraw; a load of which is fufficient to preferve forty tons of turnips. The method is eafy, and as follows:

After drawing your turnips in February, cut off the tops and tap roots (which may be given to sheep) and let them lie a few days in the field, as no weather will then hurt them.

Then, on a layer of ftraw next the ground, place a layer of turnips two feet thick; and then another layer of ftraw, and fo on alternately, till you have brought the heap to a point. Care must be taken to turn up the edges of the layers of ftraw, to prevent the turnips from rolling out; cover the top well with long

fraw, and it will serve as a thatch for the whole.

In this method, as the ftraw im. bibes the moisture exhaled from the roots, all vegetation will be prevented, and the turnips will be nearly as good in May as when first drawn from the field. If ftraw be fcarce, old haulm or ftubble will anfwer the fame purpose.

But, to prevent this trouble and expence, perhaps farmers in all counties would find it moft to their intereft to adopt the method used by our neighbours the Norfolk farmers, which is, to continue fowing turnips to the latter end of Auguft; by which means their late crops remain good in the field till the latter end of April, and often till the middle of May.

The advantages of having turnips good till the fpring-feed is generally ready, are fo obvious and fo great, that many of our farmers (although at first prejudiced against the practice) are now come into it, and find their account in fo doing.

I wish thefe few hints may prove in any degree ufeful; and am, wifhing all poffible fuccefs to the Bath Society,

W. P.

Your very humble fervant, Suffolk, March 1, 1780.

ANTIQUITIES.

[64]

ANTIQUITIES.

[blocks in formation]

annoying the enemy from that nation*, at leaft with a crossbow t.

We therefore find that William the Conqueror had a confiderable number of bowmen in his army at the battle of Haftings, when no mention is made of fuch troops on the fide of Harold. I have upon this occafion made ufe of the term bowman, though I rather conceive that thefe Norman archers fhot

with the Arbaleft (or crofs-bow) in

which formerly the arrow was plac ed in a groove; being termed in French a quadrel, and in English a bolt ‡.

Though I have taken fome pains to find out when the shooting with the long bow firft began with us, at which exercife we afterwards became fo expert, I profefs that I cannot meet with any pofitive proofs, and must therefore flate fuch grounds for conjecture as have occurred.

Our chroniclers do not mention

The term of butt, or mound of earth on which the marks are fixed, is likewife French.

By the late publication of Domefday, it appears that Balistarius was a moft common addition to English names, but I have not happened to meet with that of Arcitenens. See in Suffolk, Warwickshire, Gloucestershire, and fome more counties. In the Bayeux tapeftry indeed the Normans are reprefented as drawing the long bow; but it is conceived that this arras was woven many centuries after the Norman invafion, and when that weapon was used in France.

Hence the term, I have bot my bolt. This fort of arrow is now chiefly uted in Norfolk, where it is useful in fhooting rabbits, which do not take a general alarm, as upon firing a gun.

Fitz Stevens, who wrote in the reign of Henry the Second, fays that the London fkaters moved fafter than telum balife; which feems to prove that the cross-bow was most commonly used at that time.

the

[blocks in formation]

After the death of Richard the Firft in 1199, I have not happened to ftumble upon any paffages alluding to archery for nearly one hundred and fifty years; when an order was iffued by Edward the Third, in the fifteenth year of his reignt, to the fherives of most of the English counties for providing five hundred white bows, and five hundred bundles of arrows, for the then intended war against France.

Similar orders are repeated in the following years; with this difference only, that the theriff of Glouceftershire is directed to furnish five hundred painted bows, as well as the fame number of white.]]

The famous battle of Creffy was fought four years afterwards, in which our chroniclers ftate that we had two thoufand archers, who were oppofed to about the fame number of the French; together with a circumftance, which feems to prove that by this time we ufed the longbow, whilft the French archers fhot with the arbaleft.

Previous to this engagement fell a very heavy rain, which is faid to have much damaged the bows of the French, or perhaps rather the ftrings of them. Now our long-bow (when unftrung) may be moft conveniently covered, fo as to prevent the rain's injuring it, nor is there fcarcely any addition to the weight from fuch a cafe; whereas the arbaleft is of a moft inconvenient form to be fheltered from the weather.

As therefore, in the year 1342, orders iffued to the fherives of each county to provide five hundred bows, with a proper proportion of arrows, I cannot but infer that thefe were long-bows, and not the arbaleft.

Du Cange cites Guiaft, an ancient French poet, for the fame fact: and Vinefauf mentions that this king killed many Turks with his own cross-bow, 1. 3. c. 11. It is not from these facts prefumed that neither English or French ever used any fort of long bow at this period, but only that it did not prevail fo much as to train the archers in companies, in the inanner that the Arbalèfters were disciplined. It is not stated from what bow the arrow iffued which killed William Rufus.-In Shakespear's time deer were killed by the cross-bow. See Hen. VI.

+A. D. 1341. See Rymer-Before this, Froiffart mentions four thousand English archers in 1327, and two thousand at the battle of Cayent in 1337.

Garbas, which Du Cange fhews to have confifted, at a mecium, of twentyfour arrows. By another order (in Rymer) it appears that the white bows were fix pence cheaper than the painted ones.

The painted bows were confidered probably as fmarter by this military corps, and poffibly this covering might contribute to duration alfo. As for the white bows, it fhould feem that they were not made of yew, which is rather of a reddish brown, nor could the fheriff well have found a fufficient quantity of this material in his county. We find indeed, by fubiequent ftatutes, that yew was imported for this purpose at a very high price. For thefe orders to the she rives fee Rymer, A. D. 1342 and 1343.

VOL XXVII,

F

We

« TrướcTiếp tục »