Triumph Revisited: Historians Battle for the Vietnam War
More than thirty years later, the Vietnam War still stands as one of the most controversial events in the history of the United States, and historians have so far failed to come up with a definitive narrative of the wartime experience. With competing viewpoints already in play, Mark Moyar’s recent revisionist approach in Triumph Forsaken has created heated debate over who "owns" the history of America’s war in Vietnam.
Triumph Revisited: Historians Battle for the Vietnam War collects critiques of Triumph Forsaken from both sides of this debate, written by an array of Vietnam scholars, cataloguing arguments about how the war should be remembered, how history may be reconstructed, and by whom. A lively introduction and conclusion by editors Andrew Wiest and Michael Doidge provide context and balance to the essays, as well as Moyar’s responses, giving students and scholars of the Vietnam era a glimpse into how history is constructed and reconstructed.
Nội dung mọi người đang nói đến - Viết bài đánh giá
Review: Triumph Revisited: Historians Battle for the Vietnam WarĐánh giá của Người dùng - Christopher - Goodreads
A silly book about a silly book. This volume unnecessarily and unjustifiably aggrandizes Moyar's polemic. The quality of the contributions is uneven, though this is perhaps to be expected: it would be ... Đọc toàn bộ bài đánh giá
Review: Triumph Revisited: Historians Battle for the Vietnam WarĐánh giá của Người dùng - Jon Klug - Goodreads
Triumph Revisited is comprised of historians commenting on Dr. Mark Moyar's revisionist book Triumph Forsaken and Mark responding to their comments. While mostly civil discourse, there are times when ... Đọc toàn bộ bài đánh giá
The Intervention Debate: Towards a Posture of Principled Judgement
Không có xem trước - 2002